Documentation (5 ECTS)

Learning outcomes

The student understands why and how cultural heritage is invent oried and documented. The student understands the meaning of context in cultural heritage.The student knows the basics of photogrammetry and laser scanning. The student understands how to use these methods for conservation research and documentation. The student understands the use of X-ray photography in conservation research and documentation.

Content

Documentation forms and terminology
Photogrammetry
Laser scanning
X-ray photography
Image prosessing exercises

Teaching methods

Lecture, contact teaching, assignments, independent work with literature.

Location and time

Contact teaching will be held at the Arabia Campus, Hämeentie 135 D.

Learning materials and recommended literature

To be announced before the course start.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

No other options.

Internship and working life connections

Working life collaboration takes place through possible visits and visiting lecturers and professional discussions. Objects for the study modules will be acquired through museums, institutions and private clients.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

No exam.

Student workload

The weekly working hours of a student is 1,5 cr which is equivalent to 40 hours of studies. 40 hours is formed from approx. 17 hours of contact studies with a lecturer. The remaining hours is spent by independent literature survey or practical work. 1 credit (cr) is equivalent to 27 hours (h).

Further information for students

Attendance requirement 80 %.

During the study module the student should read up on the given literature together with practical work.

The course will be implemented as a project based learning. The idea is learning through making practical work. Student has a role as an investigative learner.

Assessment methods and criteria

Learning assignment 70 %, continuous assessment 30 %.

Assessment is based on continuous assessment of a student and attendance together with l

Assessment is based on continuous assessment of a student, attendance, practical exercises, and other learning assignments. Each student is assessed from the starting point of her/his abilities. MInimum 80 % presence of contact studies must fulfill.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has a lot of absences from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and learning assignments is unsatisfactory. The student should improve her/his group working abilities.

The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and therefore the problem solving and ability to apply theoretical studies to a practical work need to be improved.

The student does not work independently and there is a lot of need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has not given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is unbalanced. The student needs to improve her/his skills and knowledge in many areas.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has taken part to all of the teaching sessions and learning assignments and the activity for the course is good. The student acts flexibly as a group member.

The studies proceed coherently. The student is able to understand the basic motifs of the course and is able to apply theoretical studies to a practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal works is competent and the student understands causes and consequences of one's choice.

The student works independently but there is still need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is balanced. The student has achieved a good level at her/his skills and knowledge

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The course objectives have been achieved in a competent manner. Student has taken actively and constructively part to the teaching and learning assignments. Student’s function enhances group activities.

The student masters the motifs of the course and prerequisites and is able to apply theoretical studies to a practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal works is professional and the student can validate causes and consequences of one's choice.

The student works independently enough. The student is able to master the whole of subject both in theory and practice. The student has achieved an excellent level at her/his skills and knowledge.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student has a lot of absences from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and learning assignments is unsatisfactory. The student should improve her/his group working abilities.

The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and therefore the problem solving and ability to apply theoretical studies to a practical work need to be improved.

The student does not work independently and there is a lot of need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has not given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is unbalanced. The student needs to improve her/his skills and knowledge in many areas.