Evidence-based Practices in Health Care (5 ECTS)

Objective

The student is able to develop and lead evidence-based practices and take on a managerial role in evidence-based nursing practice.

Content

- Evidence-based health care
- The concepts and processes of evidence-based practice
- Evidence-based nursing, ensuring competence, and advanced practice nursing
- Evidence-based leadership and management in nursing
- Systematic data collection and analysis as a part of evidence-based practice
- Critical evaluation of evidence in managerial practices
- Utilisation of summarised research information in professional decision-making

Location and time

1.9.2025 Orientaatio opintoihin Myllypuron kampuksella
Verkko-opetus lukujärjestyksen mukaisesti

Materials

• Aveyard, H., Sharp, P., & Woolliams, M. (2022). A Beginner’s Guide to Evidence-Based Practice in Health and Social Care.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare.
• National guidelines and resources (e.g., Current Care Guidelines, Health Village, publications from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare)
• Selected current articles

Teaching methods

o Lectures and online materials
o Reflective learning assignments
o Group discussions and peer feedback
o Case analyses and simulations (e.g., clinical decision-making scenarios)
o Development assignment related to the student’s work environment

Employer connections

The learning assignment is work-life oriented.

Exam schedules

n/a

International connections

n/a

Completion alternatives

n/a

Student workload

5 cr = 27h x 5cr = 135h

Content scheduling

n/a

Further information

Cheating and Academic Integrity
By submitting online exams or assignments, the student confirms that the demonstration of their competence is based on independent work and ethical conduct. Academic dishonesty may result in disciplinary action, including suspension from the university of applied sciences for up to one year (Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014, Section 38). To ensure the independence of students’ performance in online implementations, the teacher may, at their discretion, require demonstrations of competence in supervised settings or in an oral examination. The teacher will inform students about the method of demonstrating competence at the beginning of the course.

Use of Artificial Intelligence
In this course, AI tools may be used for idea generation and drafting. AI may also be utilized for structuring texts and checking language. However, AI must not be used to replace the student’s own thinking or written responses. The student must clearly and transparently describe how and where AI tools have been used in their work. More detailed guidelines on the use of AI and referencing AI tools can be found in the Student Desktop (OMA) under Student Guide > Instructions and Rules > Use of AI in Learning Activities and Theses – Student Guidelines.

Teacher’s Materials
Assignments and materials created by the teacher or lecturer are protected by copyright law (Copyright Act 404/61). These materials are intended solely for use in the student’s own studies. Public distribution or sharing of the materials is only permitted with the author’s permission.

Course Feedback
Feedback will be collected on the course implementation and is an important part of the continuous development of teaching and learning. By giving feedback, you have the opportunity to influence the content of the course and the development of teaching practices. Feedback helps teachers improve their implementations and teaching methods across different courses. Providing constructive feedback also enhances your own professional skills. The course feedback is given anonymously, and the identity of the respondent cannot be identified.

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
If a student receives an RPL decision as a pedagogical solution, the decision must be submitted to the responsible teacher before the start of the course. Please refer to Metropolia’s RPL guidelines in OMA:
https://opiskelija.oma.metropolia.fi/group/pakki/opiskelijan-opas/opinnot/opintojen-suunnittelu-ja-opinto-ohjaus/ahot/ahot-alakohtaiset-ohjeet#sote

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates competence in the basic content of the course, but there are deficiencies in the ability to find and interpret information and to apply the learned content to the context of working life.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates good competence in the content of the course. The student is able to actively search for information and to identify its connection to working life. The student is able to analyse and apply the learned content to the context of working life.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates versatile and extensive competence in the content of the course. The student has an excellent ability to search for relevant information. The student’s solutions demonstrate independence, responsibility, and skills in guiding others. The student’s ability to apply the learned content to the context of working life exhibits creativity and versatility.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Fail:
The student does not demonstrate competence in the basic content of the course and there are deficiencies in his/her ability to find and interpret information and to apply the learned content to the context of working life.

Assessment methods and criteria

Completion Criteria
To pass the course, the student must successfully complete the learning assignments as described in the course description. The assignments are assessed using a specific evaluation matrix aligned with the learning outcomes.

Assessment Criteria Framework
Assessment Criteria – Satisfactory, Very Satisfactory (Grades 1–2)
The student demonstrates a basic understanding of the course content in the assessment areas. However, there are shortcomings in independent information retrieval, interpretation, and the ability to connect learned knowledge to the context of working life.

Assessment Criteria – Good, Very Good (Grades 3–4)
The student demonstrates a solid understanding of the course content in the assessment areas. They actively seek out information and are able to interpret its relevance to working life. They can analyze what they have learned and apply it effectively in professional contexts.

Assessment Criteria – Excellent (Grade 5)
The student demonstrates a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the course content across the assessment areas. They show excellent, purposeful information retrieval skills and make independent, responsible decisions, with the ability to guide others. Their application of learning to working life demonstrates creativity and a broad perspective.

Pass/Fail Assessment Criterion
The criteria for a passing grade are equivalent to the criteria for a satisfactory (Grade 1) assessment, indicating that core competence has been achieved.