Study Guide

Objective

The student knows how to prepare the master drawings of the building he/she has designed in accordance with the regulations.
The student knows the national permit practice and the duties of a building designer when applying for a building permit.
The student knows the general requirements of master drawings and knows how to take them into account in construction planning tasks and preparation of master drawings prior to the building permit stage.
The student can find out and follow the regulations and instructions related to the presentation method and content of the main drawings. The student knows how to use sources typical of the professional field to find out regulations and instructions.
The student can justify and critically evaluate the presentation of the main drawings and the design solutions presented in the drawings.
The student knows how to make use of his previously accumulated theory and design knowledge.
The student knows how to analyze initial data and form conclusions and develop solutions that develop professional activities from the conclusions.
The student knows how to act as an active self-directed learner and a member of a group.
The student is able to examine the topics covered in the Study Course critically from the perspective of aesthetic, technical, functional and ecological sustainability.

Content

Key concepts related to the topic.
Regulations and instructions related to the preparation of the master drawings, the presentation method and the content to be presented.
Common practices of the Capital Region's building controls.
National permit practice, applying for a building permit, building permit and supporting documents.
Archivable master drawing set.

Prerequisites

Completed: all previous courses in the project, material and construction theory of the Construction Architecture degree program.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands only a little of the topics covered in the Study Course. There are significant shortcomings in the application of topics to the tasks of a building designer.
The quality of the set of documents prepared by the student is satisfactory. The contents of the document series are significantly incomplete and incorrect, and the justifications for the contents are flimsy. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. There are significant deficiencies in the management of the document preparation process.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student manages the content of the study course and achieves the Competence Objectives of the study course well.
The student understands the basics of the subject of the course and knows how to apply what he has learned to practical work. He can consistently justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the documents prepared during the Study Course. The set of documents prepared by the student is in accordance with the instructions.
The student has utilized the guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received. Work progresses consistently during the Study Course and activity in lectures and assignments is good. The student controls the document preparation process.
The student takes responsibility and commits not only to his own activities but also to the activities of the group. The student knows how to give and receive feedback actively and constructively. He examines and evaluates things from both his own and the local community's point of view.
The student has very few absences.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters the content of the course and achieves the Competence Objectives commendably.
The student has a commendable understanding of the issues discussed in the Study Course and knows how to apply what he has learned in a versatile and insightful way to practical work. The student can competently describe and justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the documents they prepare. The set of documents prepared by the student is in accordance with the instructions and of a high standard.
The student has participated actively and constructively in the teaching. He has actively utilized guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received.
The student knows how to cooperate in a responsible, flexible, committed and constructive way. He develops both his own and the group's interaction.
The student systematically uses the feedback as a tool for his own and his community's professional growth. He examines and evaluates himself as well as the community or work group in which he works in his professional field.
The student has no absences.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands only a little of the topics covered in the Study Course. There are significant shortcomings in the application of topics to the tasks of a building designer.
The quality of the set of documents prepared by the student is satisfactory. The contents of the document series are significantly incomplete and incorrect, and the justifications for the contents are flimsy. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. There are significant deficiencies in the management of the document preparation process.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Further information

The starting point is participation and thus learning.
The student works as an active research learner.
Participation in face-to-face teaching and the return of the exercises according to the schedule are the evaluation criteria.