Skip to main content

Social Network Service Design Project (10 ECTS)

Code: KM00DB17-3003

General information


Enrollment
01.11.2019 - 06.01.2020
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
12.03.2020 - 13.05.2020
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
10 ECTS
Mode of delivery
On-campus
Campus
Hämeentie 135 D
Teaching languages
Finnish
English
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
Media Communication
Teachers
Markus Norrena
Jukka Yrjönen
Teacher in charge
Mika Rintala
Groups
IEXSC20SH2
Exchange Students Culture and Creative Industries, Helsinki 2020 Spring
Course
KM00DB17
No reservations found for implementation KM00DB17-3003!

Learning outcomes

Students are capable of designing and implementing a social network service. Students are able to work in a specialist capacity in a multidisciplinary work group.

Content

Students work in projects where they take on a professional role in which they do not have advanced experience. The role may be, for example, one of the following: chief technology officer, producer/leader, user interface and usability designer or chief content and concept officer.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Regular attendance in meetings. Good teamwork skills. Good project documentation. Ability to apply the learned knowledge independently. Self-initiated learning. Ability to make use of feedback. The end product is adequate.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Regular attendance in meetings. Inspiring team worker. Ability to apply the learned knowledge and reflect on it. Exemplary interaction with clients. Excellent project documentation. The end product exceeds the client’s expectations.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.

Go back to top of page