Sustainable Development in Information and Communication Technology (3 ECTS)

Location and time

Depends on Student

Materials

Different databases for excample ElseVier, ScienceDirect

Employer connections

N/A

Exam schedules

N/A

International connections

N/A

Completion alternatives

N/A

Evaluation methods and criteria

Pass/Fail

Student workload

Up to Student

Content scheduling

Up to Student

Teaching methods

Self-Study course - aims of the article

Further information

1. Introduction - and aims of the article
2. Contents - of the article overviewed according to its logical structure, the model used in the research and
methods for analysis and research
3. Results - contribution of the research, what is new, its scientific value, conclusions.
4. Evaluation - your own opinion and critical evaluation of clarity, readability and results of the
article.
Return essee to Janne Salonen janne.salonen@metropolia.fi

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student knows
- the definition and components of sustainable development
- the main aspects of SD in her/his own sector (IT, media, logistics)
The student is able to
- identify SD activities in a company in her/his own branch

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student knows
- the definition and components of sustainable development
- the main aspects of SD both in her/his own sector (IT, media, logistics) and in general
- some development tools in one area of SD
The student is able to
- identify and evaluate SD activities in a company in her/his own branch

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student knows
- the definition and components of sustainable development
- the aspects of SD widely both in her/his own sector (IT, media, logistics) and in the other areas of the society
- the major development tools and methods SD and corporate social responsibility (GRI, ISO 26000, ISO 14001, EMAS, etc.)
The student is able to
- identify, evaluate and develop SD activities in a company in her/his own branch

Further information

1. Introduction - and aims of the article
2. Contents - of the article overviewed according to its logical structure, the model used in the research and
methods for analysis and research
3. Results - contribution of the research, what is new, its scientific value, conclusions.
4. Evaluation - your own opinion and critical evaluation of clarity, readability and results of the
article.
Return essee to Janne Salonen janne.salonen@metropolia.fi