Leader as coach (5 ECTS)

Learning outcomes

After completing the course, the student understands the principles of dialogic and coaching leadership and knows how to analyse and develop his own activities based on them. The student is able to manage diversity in their work community with a coaching approach. The student knows how to develop their own and others' well-being at work. The student knows how to analyze the effects of changes on the work community and on individuals and is able to act proactively to strengthen the sense of agency of the work community and individuals.

Content

* Dialogic leadership
*Coaching management style
* Psychological safety
* Workplace diversity
* Work well-being
* Career management
* Sense of agency

Prerequisites

Completed higher education degree (Bachelor level)

Teaching methods

Our goal in this course is so-called flipped learning, where the goal is a self-directed student, the method is communal learning, and the learning is supported by a teacher facilitating the learning process (Toivola, M. & Silfverberg, H. 2016).

The course utilizes diverse learning in the form of face-to-face and distance learning.

Location and time

Tuition in Finnish.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Prereading material: Carol Dweck, The new Psychology of Success. Any edition will do.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

Not available.

Internship and working life connections

The course assignments will be applied to one's own worklife and networking.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

No exam.

International connections

Tuition in Finnish

Student workload

Prereading material 15 hours
Other material 50 hours
Workshops 30 hours
Development plan implementation 45 hours

Content scheduling

Tuition in Finnish

Assessment methods and criteria

The following are required for the approved completion of the course:
1. Active participation in discussions during online meetings and sharing key observations on Moodle. Or, if this is not possible, independent completion of online meeting tasks and high-quality reflections on Moodle based on the recording and materials. (40 points) Note! Learning is always of higher quality when you are there to listen and ask questions.
2. Developing your own theory of use and toolkit based on an analysis of your current personal situation and its high-quality documentation and presentation as instructed (60 p)
3. Participation in coaching team activities, where coaching working methods are practiced in practice, and reporting on the work. The work can be carried out remotely or in person, depending on the students' own situations. (included in item 1)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good overall performance: can apply and articulate concepts and information well both verbally and in writing, certain areas of individual or team output require further attention; shows appropriate level of interest and motivation in individual and team activities. Good presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent performance in all elements of the course: shows interest and motivation in individual and team activities and assignments, fully applies and clearly articulates concepts and information both verbally and in writing. The student is able to support his/her argument with references to the recommended reading and lecture content. Excellent presentation delivery and analysis.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good overall performance: can apply and articulate concepts and information well both verbally and in writing, certain areas of individual or team output require further attention; shows appropriate level of interest and motivation in individual and team activities. Good presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent performance in all elements of the course: shows interest and motivation in individual and team activities and assignments, fully applies and clearly articulates concepts and information both verbally and in writing. The student is able to support his/her argument with references to the recommended reading and lecture content. Excellent presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.