Skip to main content

Factors Influencing a Therapeutic Relationship and Swedish at Work (5 ECTS)

Code: SX00EQ65-3008

General information


Enrollment
10.03.2025 - 31.03.2025
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
26.05.2025 - 31.07.2025
Implementation is running.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 ECTS
Mode of delivery
On-campus
Campus
Myllypurontie 1
Teaching languages
Finnish
Degree programmes
Occupational Therapy
Teachers
Anne Lipasti
Teacher in charge
Anne Lipasti
Course
SX00EQ65

Implementation has 7 reservations. Total duration of reservations is 21 h 0 min.

Time Topic Location
Mon 02.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsi, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA5020 Oppimistila
Wed 04.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsi, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA6012 Oppimistila
Thu 05.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsi, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA6012 Oppimistila
Mon 09.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsi, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA6012 Oppimistila
Wed 11.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsi, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA6012 Oppimistila
Thu 12.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
ETÄ/Ruotsin suullinen tentti, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA6012 Oppimistila
Fri 13.06.2025 time 09:00 - 12:00
(3 h 0 min)
Ruotsin kirjallinen tentti, Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät ja työelämän ruotsi (ruotsin osuuden kesätoteutus) SX00EQ65-3008
MPA4015 Luentosali
Changes to reservations may be possible.

Location and time

Campus, Myllypuro, according to schedule

Materials

Teachers own, available at course start

Ther.rel:
https://www.ttl.fi/teemat/tyohyvinvointi-ja-tyokyky
https://www.tyosuojelu.fi/tyoolot/psykososiaalinen-kuormitus/arviointi
https://www.tyohyvinvointi.fi/
Toimijuuden tuki: dialoginen ohjaus (2015) Merja Koivuluhta ja Päivi Annika Kauppila (toim.)
https://erepo.uef.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/15092/urn_isbn_978-952-61-1759-1.pdf

Exam schedules

written exam the last lesson, spoken language level check the second last lesson

Ther.rel: 2 assignments

Evaluation methods and criteria

Spoken language and written language skills evaluation separately. Evaluation on a scale 0-5

Ther.relationships: 2 assignments pass/ not pass

Student workload

attendance at lectures, independent work, written tasks outside the lesson time

Ther.rel: exercises and attendance at lectures, independent work, written tasks

Content scheduling

Terapiasuhteeseen vaikuttavat tekijät: opetuskontaktit ennen ja jälkeen harjoittelun. Kts. lukujärjestys.

Teaching methods

interactive exercises, group work, lectures

Further information

There are 2 separete courses in one course

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Assessment criteria:

Factors Influencing a Therapeutic Relationship:
See the curriculum attachment.
The course instructor will specify the evaluation criteria in the beginning of the course.


Swedish at Work:
The student can communicate in their most typical general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write simple texts with a reasonable amount of consistency. There may be errors, but the message comes across nevertheless. The student takes part in simple interaction, but often needs help from other speakers. The student is comfortable with everyday vocabulary and the vocabulary of their own field, but inaccuracies and the influence of other languages may make it difficult to get the message across. The student uses the commonest basic structures in a one-sided way and sometimes incorrectly. The student can pronounce understandably but not like a native, and the slowness makes it difficult to assess how well the message may get across.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Assessment criteria:

Factors Influencing a Therapeutic Relationship:
See the curriculum attachment.
The course instructor will specify the evaluation criteria in the beginning of the course.

Swedish at Work:
The student can communicate reasonably well in their daily general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student is able to write a text with coherent content, getting the message across, and is proactive in interaction in common situations in the field. The student is
reasonably fluent in basic vocabulary of their field and general language. Word choices may sometimes be inaccurate and the sentence structures imperfect, but these do not interfere with the communication. The student pronounces understandably, and pauses in the flow of speech do not prevent the message from getting across.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assessment criteria:

Factors Influencing a Therapeutic Relationship:
See the curriculum attachment.
The course instructor will specify the evaluation criteria in the beginning of the course.

Swedish at Work:
The student can communicate in versatile and demanding general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write clear and detailed text in a way that is suitable and accurate for the situation. The student takes an active part in interaction in a way that is appropriate in professional situations. The student speaks fluently and effortlessly and takes into account the other speakers. The student uses general vocabulary and the vocabulary in their own field in a versatile way, making very few grammatical errors. The student pronounces clearly and the speech sounds natural.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment criteria:

Factors Influencing a Therapeutic Relationship:
See the curriculum attachment.
The course instructor will specify the evaluation criteria in the beginning of the course.

Swedish at Work:
The student can communicate in their most typical general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write simple texts with a reasonable amount of consistency. There may be errors, but the message comes across nevertheless. The student takes part in simple interaction, but often needs help from other speakers. The student is comfortable with everyday vocabulary and the vocabulary of their own field, but inaccuracies and the influence of other languages may make it difficult to get the message across. The student uses the commonest basic structures in a one-sided way and sometimes incorrectly. The student can pronounce understandably but not like a native, and the slowness makes it difficult to assess how well the message may get across.

Further information

There are 2 separete courses in one course

Go back to top of page