Project 10 urban planning (5 ECTS)

Learning outcomes

On completion of the course, the student will understand the basics of urban design.
The student will be familiar with the history of urban design and city planning.
The student will be familiar with the building regulations and guidelines related to the urban planning.
The student will be familiar with and able to use town planning notations.
The student will understand the impact of urban planning to the townscape.
The student will be able to design a simple city plan and to produce the related drawings and
specifications.
The student will be able to take the technical systems in town planning into account.
The student will understand the cost implications of town planning.

Content

Practical urban design.
History of urban design and city planning.
Impact of the urban planning related regulations and guidelines on town planning.
Town planning notations and regulations.
Practical city planning.
Technical systems in a city.
Cost implications of town planning.

Prerequisites

All previous construction architecture project courses must be completed.

Basic knowledge of urban design and technical systems in the city.

Teaching methods

Luentoja.
Ryhmätöitä ja yksilötehtäviä.
Säännöllinen projektityöskentely, ohjattuna ja itsenäisesti.
Harjoitustyö projektina

Location and time

Läsnäopetuksena päivisin syyslukukauden ajan

Learning materials and recommended literature

Ilmoitetaan myöhemmin.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

Ei ole

Internship and working life connections

Ei ole

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Ilmoitetaan myöhemmin

International connections

Ei ole

Student workload

Kurssin suorittaminen vaatii opiskelijalta itsenäistä työskentelyä ja ajankäytön suunnittelua. Ajankäyttö 5 op x 27 h = 135 h

Content scheduling

Kurssi etenee tasaisesti lukukauden aikana, painottuen syyslukukauden loppuun.

Further information for students

Läsnäolo luennoilla ja ohjauksessa vähintään 75%.
Läsnäolo väliseminaarissa sekä loppuseminaarissa.

Assessment methods and criteria

Arviointiasteikko ja arvioinnin perusteet ks. opintojakson kuvaus

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is familiar with the course subjects on a satisfactory level.
The student has often been absent from the teaching sessions. The student has problems in acting as a group member. The student's activity during the teaching sessions and rehearsals has been unsatisfactory.
The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and the student has problems to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is weak and the student has many gaps in his/her knowledge.
The student does not work independently and needs a lot of further guidance from the teacher. The student has not given a enough attention to the subject, and he/she does not have a clear overall understanding of the subject. The student is not able to work as an investigative learner.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is familiar with the course subjects on a good level.
The student has taken part in all teaching sessions and projects and his/her activity on the course has been good. The student acts flexibly as a group member.
The studies have proceeded consistently. The student is able to understand the basic topics of the course and is able to apply the theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal tasks is valid and the student understands the causes and effects of one's choices in the tasks.
The student works independently but there is still some need for further guidance from the teacher. The student has given enough attention for the subject and has an overall understanding of the subject.
The student works to some extent as an investigative learner.
Student works acceptably as an investigative learner.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters the course subjects excellently.
The student has achieved the course objectives fully. The student has taken actively and constructively part in the teaching and the project. The student’s actions enhance the group activities.
The student masters the topics of the course and its prerequisites, and is able to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is professional and the student can validate the causes and effects of his/her choices.
The student works independently. The student masters the overall subject in both theory and practice. The student works independently as an investigative learner.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is familiar with the course subjects on a satisfactory level.
The student has often been absent from the teaching sessions. The student has problems in acting as a group member. The student's activity during the teaching sessions and rehearsals has been unsatisfactory.
The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and the student has problems to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is weak and the student has many gaps in his/her knowledge.
The student does not work independently and needs a lot of further guidance from the teacher. The student has not given a enough attention to the subject, and he/she does not have a clear overall understanding of the subject. The student is not able to work as an investigative learner.