Skip to main content

Basics of Constructions (5 cr)

Code: TR00FG36-3001

General information


Enrollment

27.11.2023 - 14.01.2024

Timing

01.01.2024 - 28.04.2024

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

School of Real Estate and Construction

Campus

Myllypurontie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Construction Architecture

Teachers

  • Tomi Karppinen
  • Jorma Vilska
  • Kaisa Hyyti

Groups

  • TXR23S1
    Rakennusarkkitehtuurin tutkinto-ohjelma päivä

Objective

In the course, the student familiarizes himself with the typical frame systems of a small wooden building, structural types and structural engineering solutions.
After completing the course, the student knows the typical structural solutions used in outer skins and intermediate floors, as well as the basics of heat and humidity technology in buildings.
The student understands what are the important and essential factors in the dimensioning of wooden structures and what are the operating methods of conventional wooden structures.
The student knows how to apply the principles of wood construction in the design of aesthetically, technically, functionally and ecologically sustainable buildings.
The student familiarizes himself with the areas of mathematics that promote the learning of content important to the professional field.

Content

Basic concepts.
Conventional structural systems of wooden buildings and principles of load-bearing structures.
Conventional types of small wooden building construction.
The usual joints of a small wooden building.
Basics of strength theory.
Mathematics; functions, space geometry, spreadsheet applications.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands the basics of the subject only a little. There are significant shortcomings in the application of the basics of the subject to tasks. As a rule, the solutions are incoherent and the justifications fumbled. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. The presentation material prepared by the student is of satisfactory quality. There are significant deficiencies in process management.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student manages the content of the study course and achieves the Competence Objectives of the study course well.
The student understands the basics of the subject of the course and knows how to apply what he has learned to practical work. He can consistently justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the exercises. The presentation material prepared by the student is in accordance with the instructions.
The student has utilized the guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received. Work progresses consistently during the Study Course and activity in lectures and assignments is good. The student controls the process.
The student takes responsibility and commits not only to his own activities but also to the activities of the group. The student knows how to give and receive feedback actively and constructively. He examines and evaluates things from both his own and the local community's point of view.
The student has very few absences.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters the content of the course and achieves the Competence Objectives commendably.
The student has a commendable understanding of the subjects taught in the Study Course and knows how to apply what he has learned in a versatile and insightful way to practical work. The student can competently describe and justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the exercises. The presentation material prepared by the student is in accordance with the guidelines and of a high standard. The student controls the process commendably.
The student has participated actively and constructively in the teaching. He has actively utilized guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received.
The student knows how to cooperate in a responsible, flexible, committed and constructive way. He develops both his own and the group's interaction.
The student systematically uses the feedback as a tool for his own and his community's professional growth. He examines and evaluates himself as well as the community or work group in which he works in his professional field.
The student has no absences.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands the basics of the subject only a little. There are significant shortcomings in the application of the basics of the subject to tasks. As a rule, the solutions are incoherent and the justifications fumbled. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. The presentation material prepared by the student is of satisfactory quality. There are significant deficiencies in process management.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Prerequisites

Basic information on materials, structures and design, as well as previous compulsory studies included in the degree program.

Further information

The starting point is participation and thus learning.
The student has a role as an investigative learner.
Participation in face-to-face teaching and the return of the exercises according to the schedule are the evaluation criteria.