Diverse interaction in palliative care (5 cr)

Objective

Käännös lisätään myöhemmin

Content

Käännös lisätään myöhemmin

Location and time

Enrollment: The student enrolls in the amk taught in addition to the course of study at his own institution

Registration in Savonia:

Registration for the course is open: 1.12.23-15.1.24 (preferably before the start on 9.1.24, because the groups and topics will be shared in the introductory webinar)
Registration link: https://savonia.ilmoittaudu.fi/lobby/registration/foreign?lang=fi&courses=591

Implementation: 9 January 2024 - 10 March 2024

Materials

Watson, Jean Human caring science : a theory of nursing. Jones & Bartlett Learning cop. 2012. 2. Ed

Karvinen, I. Kylmä J. Ojanen E. Pentikäinen J. Vaskilampi T. 2012. Henki ja toivo hoitotyössä. E-kirja.

Klaava Media. Martínez ym. 2017. Dignity therapy’, a promising intervention in palliative care: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Palliat Med. 31(6): 492–509.

Chahda L. Mathisen Bernice A. Carey L B. 2017. The role of speech-language pathologists in adult palliative care. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 19: 58–68

Sairaala-haptiisit: http://www.kuurosokeat.fi/sosiaalishaptinen/sairaala-haptiisit.php www.terveyskyla.fi/palliatiivinentalo

In addition current research report

Teaching methods

Flipped learning method. Info and two contact lessons.
Contact teaching is carried out in online webinars (Savonia amk)
Starting webinar 9.1.2024 klo 9.00–12.00 zoom together with Metropolia amk

Two webinar:

Webinaari 30.1.24 klo 9–16 zoom
Webinaari 21.2.24 klo 9–16 zoom


Please note, the student is required to attend information and webinars. Participation requires remote tool management, video and audio connection.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Järjestävä oppilaitos käy opintojakson sisällön läpi aloituswebinaarissa

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

-

Student workload

5 op = 135 h

Content scheduling

Järjestävän oppilaitoksen ohjeistuksen mukaisesti
Pakollinen infotilaisuus jossa käydään opintojakson suoritukseen liittyviä asioita läpi

Pakolliset Webinaarit

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates competence in the basic content of the course, but there are deficiencies in his/her ability to find and interpret information and to apply the learned content to the context of working life.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates good competence in the content of the course. He/she is able to actively search for information and to identify its connection to working life. The student is able to analyse and apply the learned content to the context of working life.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates versatile and extensive competence in the content of the
course. He/she has an excellent ability to search for relevant information. The student’s solutions demonstrate independence, responsibility, and skills in guiding others. His/her ability to apply the learned content to the context of working life exhibits creativity and versatility.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Failed: The student does not achieve the competence goals Satisfactory 1

Assessment methods and criteria

Commendable (5) In the essay, the skills of diverse interactions and their development needs have been considered in a commendable, justified and original way. The essay demonstrates the ability to use concepts that require special expertise in the field creatively and critically in the analysis of one's own competence and its development needs. The essay applies a diverse and in-depth application of the diverse value base and professional ethics of interaction, as well as information based on good practice and evidence.

Good (3-4) In the essay, the reflection on the competence of diverse interaction and its development needs is clear and justified. The essay demonstrates the ability to use the concepts of the topic in a versatile way in the analysis of one's own competence and its development needs. The essay makes extensive use of the value base and professional ethics of diverse interactions, as well as information based on good practices and evidence.

Satisfactory (1-2) In the essay, the description of the skills of diverse interaction and the needs for its development is good, but the reflection is insufficient. The essay uses the concepts of the topic and describes one's own competence and its development needs, but there is some illogical use of the concepts or the concepts used are not opened in the text. The value base and professional ethics of diverse interactions, as well as knowledge based on good practices, can be seen in the essay. ?

Rejected In Essay, the description of diverse interaction skills and its development needs remains thin. The essay mentions concepts in the topic, but there is illogical use of the concepts or the concepts used are not opened in the text. Material used in preliminary assignments and / or obtained through information retrieval has not been utilized in the essay. The general principles of professional ethics are hardly noticeable in the essay.

Further information

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
A study unit or parts of it may be accredited based on previously acquired competence if the student has completed similar studies of higher education and/or the student has work experience to meet the competence requirements.

Objective

Käännös lisätään myöhemmin

Content

Käännös lisätään myöhemmin

Further information

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
A study unit or parts of it may be accredited based on previously acquired competence if the student has completed similar studies of higher education and/or the student has work experience to meet the competence requirements.