Study Guide

Objective

The student will be able to
• report the results of the work, to critically assess them and to bring forth proposals for improvement in an appropriate way both in writing and in speech as well as visually.

Content

- preparing and presenting Thesis report
- self-evaluation and peer evaluation
- maturity test

Location and time

Seminars and according to the schedule, the supervisor of the thesis announces the implementation of the seminars. Seminar weeks: 33, 37, 43 and 49
The workshop offer is presented in Moodle Opinnäytetyö (AMK), Terveys /Bachelor´s Thesis (UAS), Health Care

Materials

Litterature of research- and development methods,research articles of the professional area, Moodle materials

Teaching methods

Student's independent work, group-/personal supervision,opponent, workshops, seminars

Employer connections

Co-operation with the project partners

Exam schedules

N/A

International connections

Approved performance requires international source literature.

Completion alternatives

N/A

Student workload

5 cr corresponds to 135 hours of student work

Content scheduling

Autumn term 2024, seminar weeks 33, 37, 43, 49

The forms of supervision of the thesis are: group supervision (eg seminars and workshops) and also pairs individual supervision which needs to be agreed with the supervisor. The approved implementation of the Thesis is a prerequisite for the transition to the Iast course. This will be agreed with the instructor.

Further information

The assignments and MATERIALS prepared by the teacher are works in accordance with the Copyright Act (404/61) for which the teacher has copyright. Assignments AND MATERIALS may not be used except in their own studies. Their public distribution is only allowed with the permission of the teacher. Other students' works are confidential.

Course feedback:
Course feedback is collected, it is an important part of the development of teaching and activities. The course feedback is given anonymously, and the giver of the feedback cannot be identified.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See the attachment "Framework for evaluation: Final project (Bachelor's)"

Assessment criteria, good (3)

See the attachment "Framework for evaluation: Final project (Bachelor's)"

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

See the attachment "Framework for evaluation: Final project (Bachelor's)"

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See the attachment "Framework for evaluation: Final project (Bachelor's)"

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved thesis report and personal maturity test in Exam
Accepted presentation of the results of the thesis in the seminar and oral and written peer review of the second thesis and participation in the seminars of one's own group
Review of the thesis in the Turnitin plagiarism recognition system.
Publishing the thesis in the manner agreed upon by the client.

See the thesis evaluation framework Oma and Moodle Bachelor´s Thesis (UAS), Health Care

Prerequisites

Execution of the Thesis Work 5 ECTS