Skip to main content

Analytical Research Methods (5 cr)

Code: KX00ED83-3001

General information


Enrollment

28.11.2022 - 15.01.2023

Timing

10.01.2023 - 02.02.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

School of Media, Design and Conservation

Campus

Hämeentie 135

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

0 - 18

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Conservation

Teachers

  • Kirsi Perkiömäki

Teacher in charge

Kirsi Perkiömäki

Groups

  • KXA20S1
    Konservoinnin tutkinto-ohjelma päivä

Objective

On completion of the course, the student will have a wider knowledge of and skills in analytical methods. The student will be familiar with the basic principles of chemical analyses and their methodology. He/she will be able to perform spectroscopy and chromatography analyses of cultural heritage material samples and evaluate the results in cooperation with a chemist/ specialist. After completing the course the student will know and recognize chemical structures of different materials and apply analytical methods for their recocnizition.

Content

Lectures of analytical methods used in conservation
Laboratory work, analysis of object, case studies.

Location and time

Lectures and laboratory works are kept at Arabia campus, Hämeentie 135 D

Materials

Literature list and study hand out given by the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Tuition mostly in Finnish, lecture, contact teaching, guided assignments, laboratory works, independent work with literature.

Exam schedules

Tentti pidetään opintojakson aikana. Tentin uusiminen on mahdollista erikseen järjestettävänä uusintatenttiajankohtana.

Completion alternatives

Ei valinnaisia suoritustapoja

Student workload

The weekly working hours of a student is 1,5 cr which is equivalent to 40 hours of studies. 40 hours is formed from approx. 23 hours of contact studies with a lecturer. The remaining hours is spent by independent literature survey or practical work. 1 credit (cr) is equivalent to 26 hours (h).

Content scheduling

Kurssin alussa on luentoja ja tehtäviä, minkä jälkeen kurssi jatkuu laboratoriotyöskentelyn päivillä.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has a lot of absences from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and learning assignments is unsatisfactory. The student should improve her/his group working abilities.

The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and therefore the problem solving and ability to apply theoretical studies to a practical work need to be improved.

The student does not work independently and there is a lot of need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has not given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is unbalanced. The student needs to improve her/his skills and knowledge in many areas.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has taken part to all of the teaching sessions and learning assignments and the activity for the course is good. The student acts flexibly as a group member.

The studies proceed coherently. The student is able to understand the basic motifs of the course and is able to apply theoretical studies to a practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal works is competent and the student understands causes and consequences of one's choice.

The student works independently but there is still need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is balanced. The student has achieved a good level at her/his skills and knowledge

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The course objectives have been achieved in a competent manner. Student has taken actively and constructively part to the teaching and learning assignments. Student’s function enhances group activities.

The student masters the motifs of the course and prerequisites and is able to apply theoretical studies to a practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal works is professional and the student can validate causes and consequences of one's choice.

The student works independently enough. The student is able to master the whole of subject both in theory and practice. The student has achieved an excellent level at her/his skills and knowledge.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student has a lot of absences from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and learning assignments is unsatisfactory. The student should improve her/his group working abilities.

The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and therefore the problem solving and ability to apply theoretical studies to a practical work need to be improved.

The student does not work independently and there is a lot of need for teacher’s further guidance. The student has not given a requisite amount of attention for the subject and the result of the course is unbalanced. The student needs to improve her/his skills and knowledge in many areas.

Prerequisites

Chemistry 1, Advanced chemistry, chemistry 2