Skip to main content

Evaluating and Publishing the Master’s Thesis (15 ECTS)

Code: S000EQ79-3001

General information


Enrollment
02.05.2022 - 15.05.2022
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
15 ECTS
Mode of delivery
On-campus
Unit
(2019-2024) School of Wellbeing
Campus
Myllypurontie 1
Teaching languages
Finnish
Degree programmes
Master's Degree Programme in Elderly Care - Human Ageing and Services
Teachers
Minna Kalajoki
Kaija Matinheikki
Marianne Roivas
Tuula Mikkola
Mia Rosenström
Teacher in charge
Tuula Mikkola
Groups
S1621S6
Vanhustyön tutkinto-ohjelma ylempi
Course
S000EQ79
No reservations found for implementation S000EQ79-3001!

Objective

Upon completion of the course, the students can:
- write up a Master’s thesis report, communicate in writing and speaking showing expert communication skills in their field.
- show in the maturity exam an excellent command of the field’s expertise in the Master’s thesis and ability to communicate the results with expertise.

Content

• Reporting and publishing the Master’s thesis
• Sample of a maturity test that can be a press release, a blog or an article ready to be published, e.g., executive summary or another informative text related to the final thesis. The students will agree with the form and the target audience with the instructor.
.

Materials

n.d

Teaching methods

Seminar
Small group tutorial
Individual Tutorials
Process writing

Employer connections

n.d

Exam schedules

n.d

International connections

n.d

Completion alternatives

n.d

Student workload

15 ects (15*27h=405h student work)

Content scheduling

All together: 29.8.2022 12.45 -16.00
Small group tutorial:
- 30.8.2022 klo 8.45-16.00
- 24.10.2022 8.45 -16.00
Thesis Seminar:
- 17-18.11.2022 8.45-16.00
Maturity test: 19.11.2022: 8.45-12.00

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Assessment criteria, see the curriculum attachment.
The evaluation targets of the Master’s thesis are:
- Description and significance of the research and development need
- Goals of the thesis
- Data base of the thesis
- Methodological choices and implementation of the thesis
- Results, interpretation, and conclusions
- The thesis process as a whole, taking responsibility for one’s own process
- Reliability and ethics of the thesis
- Communication, language, and the layout of the thesis report

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Assessment criteria, see the curriculum attachment.
The evaluation targets of the Master’s thesis are:
- Description and significance of the research and development need
- Goals of the thesis
- Data base of the thesis
- Methodological choices and implementation of the thesis
- Results, interpretation, and conclusions
- The thesis process as a whole, taking responsibility for one’s own process
- Reliability and ethics of the thesis
- Communication, language use, and the layout of the thesis report

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assessment criteria, see the curriculum attachment
The evaluation targets of the Master’s thesis are:
- Description and significance of the research and development need
- Goals of the thesis
- Data base of the thesis
- Methodological choices and implementation of the thesis
- Results, interpretation, and conclusions
- The thesis process as a whole, taking responsibility for one’s own process
- Reliability and ethics of the thesis
- Communication, language skills, and the layout of the thesis report

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment criteria, see the curriculum attachment
The evaluation targets of the Master’s thesis are:
- Description and significance of the research and development need
- Goals of the thesis
- Knowledge base of the thesis
- Methodological choices and implementation of the thesis
- Results, interpretation, and conclusions
- The thesis process as a whole, taking responsibility for one’s own process
- Reliability and ethics of the thesis
- Communication, language skills and the layout of the thesis report

Assessment methods and criteria

Attendance
Peer critique

Go back to top of page