Project management and business activities (5 ECTS)

Objective

During the study period, the student learns about different forms of business activity and the factors affecting business activity. The student becomes familiar with the areas and tasks of project management.
The student understands the possibilities of a construction designer to work as an entrepreneur and understands the importance of networking as a prerequisite for business operations. The student understands the importance of ethical activities in business operations.
After completing the course, the student has a comprehensive understanding of what project management means from the point of view of a construction designer. The student knows the key factors in terms of project management and knows how to take them into account in building design tasks. The student can reflect on his own activities from the perspective of project management and develop his own activities.

Content

Key concepts.
Business forms.
Company brand and marketing communications.
Entrepreneurship in architecture.
Construction industry organizations and networks.
Basic concepts of construction economics (design economics, production economics, usage economics, life cycle economics, business economics).
Areas of project management.
Project plan and schedule.

Location and time

Läsnäopetuksena päivisin syyslukukauden ajan

Materials

Ilmoitetaan myöhemmin

Teaching methods

Luennot viikoittain lähiopetuksena.
Ryhmätöitä ja yksilötehtäviä.
Lopussa tentti.

Employer connections

Ei ole

Exam schedules

Ilmoitetaan myöhemmin

International connections

Ei ole

Completion alternatives

Ei ole

Student workload

Kurssin suorittaminen vaatii opiskelijalta itsenäistä työskentelyä ja ajankäytön suunnittelua. Ajankäyttö 5 op x 27 h = 135 h

Content scheduling

Kurssi etenee tasaisesti lukukauden aikana

Further information

Läsnäolo luennoilla vähintään 75%.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands the basics of the subject only a little. There are significant shortcomings in the application of the basics of the subject to tasks. As a rule, the solutions are incoherent and the justifications fumbled. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. The presentation material prepared by the student is of satisfactory quality. There are significant deficiencies in the management of the planning process.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student manages the content of the study course and achieves the Competence Objectives of the study course well.
The student understands the basics of the subject of the course and knows how to apply what he has learned to practical work. He can consistently justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the exercises. The presentation material prepared by the student is in accordance with the instructions.
The student has utilized the guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received. Work progresses consistently during the Study Course and activity in lectures and assignments is good. The student controls the design process.
The student takes responsibility and commits not only to his own activities but also to the activities of the group. The student knows how to give and receive feedback actively and constructively. He examines and evaluates things from both his own and the local community's point of view.
The student has very few absences.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student masters the content of the course and achieves the Competence Objectives commendably.
The student has a commendable understanding of the subjects taught in the Study Course and knows how to apply what he has learned in a versatile and insightful way to practical work. The student can competently describe and justify the reasons and consequences of the choices made in the exercises. The presentation material prepared by the student is in accordance with the guidelines and of a high standard.
The student has participated actively and constructively in the teaching. He has actively utilized guidance and developed his work based on the feedback he received.
The student knows how to cooperate in a responsible, flexible, committed and constructive way. He develops both his own and the group's interaction.
The student systematically uses the feedback as a tool for his own and his community's professional growth. He examines and evaluates himself as well as the community or work group in which he works in his professional field.
The student has no absences.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student masters the content of the course and satisfactorily achieves the Competence Objectives of the course.
The student understands the basics of the subject only a little. There are significant shortcomings in the application of the basics of the subject to tasks. As a rule, the solutions are incoherent and the justifications fumbled. The whole gives the impression that the student has internalized the contents of the course only to a small extent.
The student has made little use of guidance. The presentation material prepared by the student is of satisfactory quality. There are significant deficiencies in the management of the planning process.
The student takes responsibility for his own learning only to a small extent. He looks at and evaluates things only from his own point of view. The student's attitude is passive.
The student has a lot of absences.

Assessment methods and criteria

Arviointiasteikko ja arvioinnin perusteet ks opintojakson kuvaus

Qualifications

Project courses preceding the course, information about the construction project and its supervision.

Further information

The starting point is participation and thus learning.
The student has a role as an investigative learner.
Participation in face-to-face teaching and the return of the exercises according to the schedule are the evaluation criteria.

Further information

The starting point is participation and thus learning.
The student has a role as an investigative learner.
Participation in face-to-face teaching and the return of the exercises according to the schedule are the evaluation criteria.