Opinto-opas

Objective

The student will develop skills to carry out an advanced task in his/her professional field. The course is carried out either as a working life project or as a special project specified by Metropolia. The project does not have to be a development task for the company, but it needs to develop the student’s professional skills and know-how in a new area.

Content

Alternative contents for the project:
1. Industrial engineering reports for an infrastructure site and planning work for a real life project. The project and instructor will be negotiated with the company.
2. Working methods
3. Work planning
4. Schedule
5. Quality assurance
6. Cost management
7. Machinery and equipment
8. Occupational safety
9. Traffic arrangements during construction
10. Environmental impact control
11. Planning a real life infrastructure project (The project and instructor will be negotiated with the company. E.g. a street plan or a foundation plan.)
12. Literature survey on an agreed topic
As a result of the project the student will create a written report, in which he or she presents plans with reasoning and alternatives, or a research report based on literature.
The results of the project will be presented at a seminar held at the end of the course.
Attendance at the seminar is compulsory for all students.

Teaching methods

Toteutetaan pääosin itsenäisenä syventävänä opiskeluna.

Exam schedules

Ei tenttiä.

Student workload

Alkaa yhteisillä luennoilla, jonka jälkeen itsenäistä, mutta ohjattua opiskelua.

Further information

Voi toteutta omaan tahtiin lähijakson jälkeen.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The report is clear and rather logical.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The report is good, the amount of work is rather big, the work is well finished, and acting as an opponent, participation and presentation are all good.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

An excellent report, which presents the results from extensive work, and fluent presentation. The report is properly finished, the student has been an active opponent and participated very well during seminar days. The work potentially has high added value.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The report is clear and rather logical; there may be some shortcomings in the finishing, acting as an opponent, and participation during seminar days or the presentation. Medium amount of work.

Assessment methods and criteria

Arvionti perustuu syventävän aiheen tutkielmaan ja sen esittämiseen raportissa.

Qualifications

Curriculum based studies has been completed except last year studies.

Further information

-