Terveysviestintä (5 cr)
Code: S000DK32-3001
General information
Enrollment
02.05.2019 - 15.05.2019
Timing
01.08.2019 - 10.12.2019
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
3 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
40 % Contact teaching, 60 % Distance learning
Unit
Terveys
Campus
Myllypurontie 1
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 27
Degree programmes
- Terveyden edistämisen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
Teachers
- Teija Rautiola
- Marja Hult
Teacher in charge
Teija Rautiola
Groups
-
S1918S6Terveyden edistämisen tutkinto-ohjelma (ylempi AMK)
Objective
The student
- applies various approaches, theories and channels of communication to health promotion
- has skills to communicate, argument and advocate evidence based health promotion
- is able to communicate with diverse population and cultural groups using suitable methods
Content
- Effective methods of communication
- Information technology, social media, mass media and health promotion campaigns
- Methods related to advocacy and sociatal influence
- Social marketing
Location and time
Periods 1 and 2
Materials
Literature will be refined at the beginning of the course:
1. Fertman, Carl I., et al. Health Promotion Programs : From Theory to Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2016. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/metropolia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4718311. pdf
2. Don Nutbeam, Elizabeth Harris, Marilyn Wise. Theory in a Nutshell
3. Learning material in Moodle
4. Griffin, Em (2011). A First Look at Communication Theory.
Eight Edition. New York: McGraw Hill College Div.,
Chapt. 2, 5 & 6.
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments, presentations
Moodle
Individual and group work
Group discussion and reflection
Exam schedules
Englanniksi
More specified in the beginning of the course
Learning assignment (-s) / Project task
Student workload
2 ECTS lectures
3 ECTS individual- and moodleworking
Participation in contact learning sessions
Content scheduling
Content and periodization will be refined later
Evaluation scale
0-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student displays competence to deal with the basic content of the study unit but lacks competence in independent data acquisition, interpretation and the ability to apply the acquired knowledge to the context of workplace.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student fulfills the requirements for the study unit well. S/he displays competence in active data acquisition and is able to interpret the key features of the data to a clinical setting. The student has the ability to analyze the acquired knowledge and to apply it to the context of workplace.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student displays broad and versatile competence in the content of the study unit. S/he has great competence in targeted data acquisition. The student’s ability to make decisions shows independent thinking, responsible actions and leadership skills. The ability to apply the acquired knowledge to the context of workplace is creative and versatile.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass: The student is proficient in the basic content of the study unit (competence evaluation), but independent data acquisition, interpretation and the ability to apply the acquired knowledge to the context of workplace has shortcomings.
Assessment methods and criteria
Will be specified later
Participation in contact learning session
Learning assignement ( -t ) / Project assignment in the group / Exam