Skip to main content

User-Centred Design Project (10 ECTS)

Code: KM00DB14-3003

General information


Enrollment
01.04.2019 - 01.09.2019
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
22.10.2019 - 12.12.2019
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
10 ECTS
Mode of delivery
On-campus
Campus
Hämeentie 135 D
Teaching languages
Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
Media Communication
Teachers
Markus Norrena
Eeva Meltio
Teacher in charge
Markus Norrena
Course
KM00DB14
No reservations found for implementation KM00DB14-3003!

Learning outcomes

Students are able to apply a user-centred design approach to their work and make technological and content-related choices during the execution of a project.

Content

Students work in projects where they take on a professional role of their choice. The role may be, for example, one of the following: chief technology officer, producer/leader, user interface and usability designer or chief content and concept officer.

Teaching methods

Published in group's Google Calendar

Assessment methods and criteria

Continuous evaluation, see curricula.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Regular attendance in meetings. Good teamwork skills. Good project documentation. Ability to apply the learned knowledge independently. Self-initiated learning. Ability to make use of feedback. The end product is adequate.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Regular attendance in meetings. Inspiring team worker. Excellent project documentation. Ability to apply the learned knowledge and reflect on it. Exemplary interaction with clients. The end product exceeds the client’s expectations.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.

Go back to top of page