Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Suorituksen johtaminen (5 cr)

Code: T100DL50-3003

General information


Enrollment

02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020

Timing

10.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

ICT ja tuotantotalous

Campus

Karaportti 2

Teaching languages

  • English

Seats

50 - 70

Degree programmes

  • Master's Degree Programme in Industrial Management

Teachers

  • Juha Haimala

Teacher in charge

Juha Haimala

Groups

  • T1520S6
    Master's Degree Programme in Industrial Management ylempi

Objective

After completing the course, students will have knowledge and skills needed in analyzing financial statements in various decision making
situations in the development of business processes.

Content

– Analytical financial statements
– Analysis of profitability, leverage and growth
– Other financial ratios
– Cash flows, earnings and accruals, earnings quality
– Credit risk analysis
– Valuation of businesses

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The coursework meets with many of the six criteria below. The assignment shows satisfactory performance in more than three of the criteria.

The following criteria are used for assessing the IM Master’s coursework (lecture involvement, discussion, written assignments and discussion leaders).
•The student shows an understanding of the relevant course content in relation to the contents of the articles, lectures and discussion.
•Student texts/presentations demonstrate an understanding of the article/lecture content and an ability to select, interpret and justify key messages in a grounded manner.
•The student shows interconnections between the proposed concepts and current business practice, showing abilities of reflection, evaluation and discussion.
•The student shows professional initiative, active participation and responsibility in both individual and team work.
• The student shows the ability to collect valid knowledge for his/her topic from outside the course sources by using scholarly search tools, by questioning current business practice and by practicing source critique.
•Student assignment is written in line with academic writing practice and instructions for Master’s Thesis, using the Harvard Referencing system, with references both in the text as well as reference list. The texts are written in coherent, fluent English.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The coursework meets with most of the above criteria.
Additionally the assignment shows good quality performance in three or more of the criteria or otherwise good interpretation.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The coursework meets with all the above six criteria. Additionally the assignment shows excellence in three or more of the above criteria or otherwise deviating excellence.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

•Student texts/presentations demonstrate an understanding of the article/lecture content and an ability to select, interpret and justify key messages in a grounded manner.
•The student shows interconnections between the proposed concepts and current business practice, showing abilities of reflection, evaluation and discussion.
•The student shows professional initiative, active participation and responsibility in both individual and team work.
• The student shows the ability to collect valid knowledge for his/her topic from outside the course sources by using scholarly search tools, by questioning current business practice and by practicing source critique.
•Student assignment is written in line with academic writing practice and instructions for Master’s Thesis, using the Harvard Referencing system, with references both in the text as well as reference list. The texts are written in coherent, fluent English.