Opinto-opas

Objective

Students recognise their own occupation and are able to give examples of occupation that is meaningful for themselves. They are able to identify occupation that is meaningful for others and examine it in relation to a given occupational analysis model. Students are able to explain the significance of occupational participation in human life and strengthen their own ideas of occupational analysis.

Content

• Occupation as a phenomenon
• Individual occupation and personally meaningful occupation
• Occupational analysis
• Occupational justice

Materials

Hautala, T. - Hämäläinen, T. & Mäkelä, L. & Rusi-Pyykönen, M. 2011. Toiminnan voimaa. Toimintaterapia käytännössä Helsinki: Edita. Erityisesti luku 1 ja luku 2 (s. 117-123)Toiminnan terapeuttisen voiman malli.
Toimintaterapian nimikkeistö 2017
Christiansen, C. 1999. Defining Lives: Occupation as Identity: An Essay on Competence, Coherence, and the Creation of Meaning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53 November/December, 547-558.
Hasselkus, B.R. 2006. The World of Everyday Occupation: Real People, Real Lives. AJOT 60 (6). 627-640.
Hocking Clare, 2009. The Challenge of Occupation: Describing the Things People do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 140-150.
Jonsson Hans, 2008. A New direction in the conceptualization and categorization of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science 15 (1) April, 3-8.
Pierce Doris, 2001. Occupation by Design: Dimensions, therapeutic power and creative process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 55 (3), 249-259
Whalley Hammell K. R. 2014 Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: An exploration
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81:39, 39-50

Teaching methods

Preassignment
Lectures
Work shop (designed by a small student group)
Written individual assignment using litterature
Occupational analysis of contextual dimentions of person's occupational experience and presentation and active participation in a seminar

Completion alternatives

Poissaolo korvaaminen:
Neuvoteltava opettajan kanssa.

Student workload

Suomen- ja englanninkielisen materiaalin käyttö välttämätöntä.

Further information

Ennakkotehtävä, jonka palautus 10.1.2021 mennessä opettajalle s-postilla.
Luennot 25. ja 26.1.. Toimintapajat (1/2 ryhmä) 3.2. ja 10.2.
Seminaaritöiden esitys (ryhmätyö) 9.3.
Kirjallisten töiden palautus 14.3.2021.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to:
- display learning in core content
- use individual professional concepts correctly
- find information for a specific situation
- distinguish between non-theoretical and theoretical information
- act in individual professional situations as instructed
- display learning in his professional field
- show that he has achieved the targets for core competence
- follow safety instructions
- display learning in the ethical principles of his professional field
- operate as a member of a student group

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to:
- display an understanding of concepts and professional knowledge in
the field
- assess and limit the amount of information needed
- operate well in typical professional duties and contexts
- operate in a multicultural environment
- operate safely
- act according to professional ethics
- operate in a student group

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to:
- use concepts and knowledge in his field systematically
- assess and use various information sources
- apply professional information in professional assignments
- work in various duties in a variety of operating environments
- act independently and responsibly in professional contexts
- to take safety issues into consideration in his action
- argue his choices on the basis of professional ethics
- organize the activities of a group of students

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Failed
- The student does not know or appreciate knowledge in the field sufficiently
- The student does not know or cannot use concepts in his field properly
- The student's professional level is not properly developed
- The student is not acting in accordance with his training and guidance
- The student is not familiar with instructions related to professional safety or ethical principles
- The student withdraws from cooperation with others

Assessment methods and criteria

Seminaariesitys (ryhmätyö) toiminnan analyysistä 50% ja yksilöllinen kirjallisuuteen perustuva kirjallinen tehtävä 50%.