Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Terveydenhuollon toimintaympäristö ja liiketoimintamallit (5 cr)

Code: S000CF69-3005

General information


Enrollment

02.12.2019 - 15.12.2019

Timing

27.01.2020 - 16.03.2020

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Kuntoutus ja tutkiminen

Campus

Myllypurontie 1

Teaching languages

  • English

Seats

20 - 35

Degree programmes

  • Master's Degree Programme in Health Business Management (Sosiaali-, terveys- ja liikunta-ala)
  • Master's Degree Programme in Health Business Management (Yhteiskuntatieteiden, liiketalouden ja hallinnon ala)

Teachers

  • Marianne Pitkäjärvi
  • Jukka Kaisla

Teacher in charge

Jukka Kaisla

Groups

  • S1119S6
    Degree Programme in Health Business Management ylempi
  • L0519S6
    Degree Programme in Health Business Management ylempi

Objective

The student knows and understands the main drivers and trends in health business; knows the concepts of opportunity and risk in the health business environment; understands the essential business models and concepts of health business; understands different forms of health business enterprises, models and practices; can apply the acquired knowledge at work.

Content

Consumer, service and production theory; Market and competitive analysis; Current issues in health business environment; Best practices of Health Business; Business Models.

Location and time

To be confirmed ASAP

Materials

Guinnes L, Wiseman, V, 2011. Introduction to Health Economics (2nd ed). Open University Press.

Teaching methods

Contact teahcing
Written assignment

Student workload

20 hrs of contact teaching
115 hrs of independent study

Further information

The responsible lecturer: Dr Jukka Kaisla. The lessons will be scheduled as soon as possible.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

1 = Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall, the assignments and/or team projects are weak and require further input. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for class activities and course assignments.

2 = Satisfactory performance: has completed all elements of the course and can apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but may not have made enough effort. Certain areas of the assignments/team project are lacking in detail and require further input. The student could have demonstrated more interest and motivation for class activities and course assignments. Satisfactory presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

3 = Good overall performance: can apply and articulate concepts and information well both verbally and in writing, certain areas of assignments/team project require further attention; shows appropriate level of interest and motivation in all class activities and course assignments. Good presentation delivery and analysis.

4 = Very good overall performance or excellent in one and very good in another element of the course: shows interest and motivation in all class activities and course assignments, applies and articulates concepts and information very well both verbally and in writing. Very good presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 = Excellent performance in all elements of the course: shows interest and motivation in all class activities and course assignments/team project, fully applies and clearly articulates concepts and information both verbally and in writing. The student follows the instructions and is able to support his/her argument with references to the recommended reading and lecture content. Excellent presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall, the assignments and/or team projects are weak and require further input. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for class activities and course assignments.