Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Julkisten hankintojen kehittäminen (5 cr)

Code: LY00EB29-3001

General information


Enrollment

23.11.2020 - 13.12.2020

Timing

12.03.2021 - 14.05.2021

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Virtual portion

5 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Liiketalous

Campus

Leiritie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

20 - 35

Degree programmes

  • Julkisten hankintojen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK, Yhteiskuntatieteiden, liiketalouden ja hallinnon ala)
  • Julkisten hankintojen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK, Tekniikan ja liikenteen ala)

Teachers

  • Perttu Pohjonen

Teacher in charge

Hanna Harilainen

Groups

  • T2320S6
    Julkisten hankintojen tutkinto-ohjelma, ylempi tekniikka
  • L1220S6
    Julkisten hankintojen tutkinto-ohjelma, ylempi amk

Objective

Upon completion of the course students will:
• be able to designate development objects and choose the most appropriate procurement development model for the situation by utilizing a procurement risk analysis, maturity analysis and gap analysis
• be able to measure the performance of the procurement department and the suppliers
• be able to recognize the procurement categories that generate most impact and measure the effectiveness of procurements
• be able to define and develop the quality of procurement
• be able to utilize the possibilities of procurement digitalization
• be able to design an innovative public procurement tender process
• understand the framework and the importance of supplier relationships and be able to apply the principles of supplier relationship management in practice

Content

• Developing a procurement organization and procurement know-how
• Developing effectiveness
• Innovative procurements
• Developing the quality of procurements
• Metrics
• Digitalization of procurements
• Managing supplier relationships

Location and time

PE 19.3. klo 9.00 - 12.00
PE 23.4 klo 9.00-12.00
PE 7.5. klo 9.00-12.00

Tehtävien palautuksen viimeistään 14.5. (final deadline)

Materials

Kirjallisuusluettelo Moodlessa

Teaching methods

Opetusmenetelmät :
Luennot, harjoitustehtävä, ja verkko-oppimistehtävät

Content scheduling

PE 19.3. klo 9.00 - 12.00
PE 23.4 klo 9.00-12.00
PE 7.5. klo 9.00-12.00

Lisäksi sparrauskertoja (tarvittaessa) 9.4., 16.4. ja 30.4.

Further information

Opintojakson osaamistavoitteet
Opiskelija osaa hankinnan riskikartoituksen, kehitysvaiheanalyysin ja gap-analyysin avulla osoittaa hankintayksikön kehittämiskohteet sekä valita hankintatoimen kehittämisen keskeisistä malleista tilanteeseen sopivan. Opiskelija osaa mitata hankintayksikön ja toimittajien suorituskykyä. Opiskelija osaa tunnistaa vaikuttavuuden kannalta merkitykselliset hankintakategoriat ja mitata hankintojen vaikuttavuutta. Opiskelija osaa määritellä ja kehittää hankintojen laatua. Opiskelija osaa hyödyntää hankintojen digitaalisaation mahdollisuuksia. Opiskelija osaa suunnitella innovatiivisen julkisen hankinnan. Opiskelija tuntee toimittajasuhteiden merkityksen ja puitteet sekä osaa soveltaa toimittajasuhteiden hallinnan periaatteita käytäntöön

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good overall performance: can apply and articulate concepts and information well both verbally and in writing, certain areas of individual or team output require further attention; shows appropriate level of interest and motivation in individual and team activities. Good presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent performance in all elements of the course: shows interest and motivation in individual and team activities and assignments, fully applies and clearly articulates concepts and information both verbally and in writing. The student is able to support his/her argument with references to the recommended reading and lecture content. Excellent presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment methods and criteria

Arvioinnin perusteet Moodlessa

Qualifications

Completed Higher Education Degree