Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Opinnäytetyö (15 cr)

Code: KI00CN05-3001

General information


Enrollment

01.09.2019 - 31.12.2019

Timing

01.11.2019 - 21.06.2021

Number of ECTS credits allocated

15 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Media, muotoilu ja konservointi

Campus

Hämeentie 135

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

1 - 50

Degree programmes

  • Konservoinnin tutkinto-ohjelma

Teachers

  • Aira Korkeamäki
  • Heikki Häyhä
  • Tannar Ruuben
  • Paula Niskanen
  • Anna Häkäri
  • Kirsi Perkiömäki
  • Päivi Ukkonen
  • Laura Mähönen

Teacher in charge

Paula Niskanen

Groups

  • KXA16S1EK
    Esinekonservointi
  • KXA16S1HK
    Huonekalukonservointi
  • KXA16S1MK
    Maalaustaiteen konservointi
  • KXA16S1TK
    Tekstiilikonservointi

Objective

The objective of the Bachelor’s Thesis is for the student to demonstrate and develop the ability of applying professional skills and knowledge to a practical development assignment or project relevant to the profession and the working life.
In Metropolia’s Bachelor’s Thesis the student learns and carries out development work, which is based on researched knowledge and other evidence and which concerns the development of professional competences or practices.
On completion of the Bachelor’s Thesis the student will be able to
• identify questions and needs for development in the professional field and the working life and to plan for their solutions
• use reliable and confined information from various sources in the development work
• apply professional skills and knowledge and use appropriate methods for the development task
• execute a development project useful for the working life or the profession in an independent, responsible and collaborative manner
• communicate in different stages of the work both to peers and to other audiences in a clear, well argumented and illustrative manner
• report the results of the work, to assess them and to bring forth proposals for improvement in an appropriate way both in writing and in speech as well as visually.

Content

Professional competence and development
• significance for the profession and the connection to professional practices
• utilization of professional knowledge
• development of professional competence
• applicability in professional life
The methods used and the results obtained
• reliablility and ethics
• validity and innovation
• the usefulness of results
• the management of the thesis process and the development work
Communication and presentation
• structure and form
• the use of standard and professional language
• the focus, clarity and consistency of the text and expressions
• critical, analytical and reflective nature of communication
• argumentation and use of reference sources

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The planning process and output:
- The student is able to follow the scheduled plan; still the use of assistance is needed.
Applying the theory, choosing the sources, logical thinking:
- The student is able to gather enough information from his/her field of study in order to formulate a thesis.
- The student is able to choose the methods for thesis, but assistance is needed.
Achieving the goals and relevance and functionality of methods used:
- The student is able to choose the appropriate tools to achieve his/her goals; still the use of assistance is needed.
- The student is able to achieve at least some of the goals set for the thesis.
Recoverable results:
- The results of the thesis make partly use for the principal.
Conclusions, critical evaluation:
- The student has been able to make some conclusions and is able to evaluate these in critical way.
The layout and reporting style:
- The student is able to make a comprehensible thesis which fulfils the given language demands. Student is able to make the thesis according the formula used in conservation.
The oral presentation is illustrative enough and suitable for thesis presentation.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The planning process and output:
- The student is able to make and follow the scheduled plan.
Applying the theory, choosing the sources, logical thinking:
- The student is able to gather information from his/her field of study in order to formulate a thesis.
- The student is able to choose independently the methods for thesis and the reasoning is competent.
Achieving the goals and the relevance and functionality of methods used:
- The student is able to achieve most of the goals set for the thesis and the results are of use to conservation profession.
Recoverable results:
- The results of the thesis make use for the principal.
Conclusions, critical evaluation:
- The student has been able to make good conclusions and has been able to evaluate these in critical way.
The layout and reporting style:
- The student has been able to make an explicit thesis which fulfils well the given language demands.
- Student has been able to make the thesis according the formula used in conservation and is able to allocate the thesis according its context. Structuring of the thesis is lucid and logical.
- The oral presentation is illustrative and informative for the thesis presentation.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The planning process and output:
- The student is able to make a good plan and follow the scheduled plan independently.
Applying the theory, choosing the sources, logical thinking:
- The student is able to gather both old and fresh information extensively from his/her field of study in order to formulate a thesis.
- The student is able to interpret the theory in a way that it supports the practical solutions.
- The student is able to choose independently the methods for thesis and the reasoning is competent.
- The student uses the methods systematically and the reasoning is convincing.
Achieving the goals and the relevance and functionality of methods used:
- The student is able to achieve all the goals set for the thesis.
- The student is able to solve specific professional challenge or the results are new and remarkable to the conservation profession.
Recoverable results:
- The results of the thesis make use widely for the principal.
Conclusions, critical evaluation:
- The student is able to make right and well-reasoned conclusions and is able to evaluate these in critical way.
- Conclusions are personal, new and interesting for the conservation.
The layout and reporting style:
- The student is able to make a professional thesis which fulfils all the given language demands.
- Student is able to make the thesis according the formula used in professional conservation and is able to allocate the thesis according professional context. Structuring of the thesis is professional, lucid and logical.
- The oral presentation is professional, illustrative and informative for the thesis presentation. Student can use all the means of visual and oral presentation.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The planning process and output:
- The student is able to follow the scheduled plan; still the use of assistance is needed.
Applying the theory, choosing the sources, logical thinking:
- The student is able to gather enough information from his/her field of study in order to formulate a thesis.
- The student is able to choose the methods for thesis, but assistance is needed.
Achieving the goals and relevance and functionality of methods used:
- The student is able to choose the appropriate tools to achieve his/her goals; still the use of assistance is needed.
- The student is able to achieve at least some of the goals set for the thesis.
Recoverable results:
- The results of the thesis make partly use for the principal.
Conclusions, critical evaluation:
- The student has been able to make some conclusions and is able to evaluate these in critical way.
The layout and reporting style:
- The student is able to make a comprehensible thesis which fulfils the given language demands. Student is able to make the thesis according the formula used in conservation.
The oral presentation is illustrative enough and suitable for thesis presentation.

Qualifications

Conservation studies years 1-4.