Introduction to Programming (5 ECTS)

Materials

Kurssilla jaettu materiaali
VIOPE-alustan kurssin materiaali
Verkkolähteet

Exam schedules

C-ohjelmoinnin osuudessa välitestit oppituntien aikana

Evaluation methods and criteria

Kurssin arviointi käydään läpi kurssin alussa.

12p + 6p VIOPE-tehtävät
6p + 6p Välitestit
20p Projekti (jakautuu osatehtäviin)

Pisteet ja arvosanat:
• 44 – 50 = 5
• 37 – 44 = 4
• 30 – 37 = 3
• 24 – 30 = 2
• 17 – 24 = 1
• 0 – 17 = 0

Student workload

1 op vastaa suunnilleen 27 tuntia opiskelijan työtä

C-ohjelmointi n. 80 h
Projekti n. 50 h

Content scheduling

Kurssin aikataulun mukaan

Teaching methods

Luento-opetus
Ohjelmointiharjoitukset
Testit
Projektityöskentely

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has achieved the course objectives fairly. The student will be able to identify, define and use the course subject area’s concepts and models. The student understands the criteria and principles of the expertise development. The student has completed the required learning exercises in minimum requirement level. His/her competences have developed in a way that he/she may complete the remaining studies and finally work in a suitable job position related to this field.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student has achieved the course objectives well, even though the knowledge and skills need improvement on some areas. The student has completed the required learning exercises in good or satisfactory level. The student is able to define the course concepts and models and is able to justify the analysis. The student is able to apply their knowledge in study and work situations. The student understands the importance of expertise in the field and is able to analyze his/her own expertise.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has achieved the objectives of the course with excellent marks. The student master commendably the course subject area’s concepts and models. The student has completed the required learning exercises in good or excellent level. The student is able to make justified and fluent analysis and to present concrete development measures. The student is well prepared to apply their knowledge study and work situations. Students are able to analyze the expertise and the evolvement of their own expertise.