Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Tehdassuunnitteluprojekti (5 cr)

Code: TX00BP89-3004

General information


Enrollment

02.12.2019 - 07.01.2020

Timing

13.01.2020 - 13.03.2020

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

(2016-2018) Puhtaat teknologiat

Campus

Leiritie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

0 - 40

Degree programmes

  • Bio- ja kemiantekniikan tutkinto-ohjelma

Teachers

  • Minna Paananen-Porkka
  • Mikko Halsas
  • Carola Fortelius

Groups

  • TXM17S1
    Bio- ja kemiantekniikan tutkinto-ohjelma
  • BIO17
    Bio- ja elintarviketekniikka

Objective

Student will perform in a team a pre-study for a biotech or food process using engineering skills learnt during previous studies
Student is familiar with the process design methodology, diagrams and concepts. Student knows the most important documents and their role in the project's success. Student understands the calculation and assessment methods. S/he can evaluate equipment design in different solutions and can make necessary calculations. Student is able to draw up basic documents and diagrams during the design process.
Student can analyze relevant costs and revenues in capital investment appraisal. Student will be aware of financing sources and their cost effects. If working capital represents a major factor student will be able to take that into account. Student knows the time value of money and appreciates the risk that is inherent in capital projects.

Content

1. Phases of process of design
2. Description of the product and market
3. Block, process and flow diagrams
4. Selection of equipment and material
5. Equipment- and layout-design
6. Permit issues
7. The calculation and assessment methods
8. Methods of costs estimate
9. Profitability assessment and sensitivity analyzes
10. Investment calculations and formats

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to implement the project according to the instructions and can create surveys and reports needed.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to run the project goal-oriented and on schedule. S/he can (independently and as part of a group) undertake studies and design the project. S/he can report the results and comment their meaningfulness. The student is an active and initiative member of the project team.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to see the project as a whole and is able to act wisely at various stages of the project. S/he can retrieve widely data from literature and is able to write a reasonable project plan. The student is able to compare the results to the literature and can draw sensible conclusions from the results. Additionally s/he is a supportive and self-imposed member of the project team.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student is able to implement the project according to the instructions and can create surveys and reports needed.