Rakennussuunnittelu, syventävät opinnot 3 (5 cr)
Code: TR00BZ55-3003
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2019 - 19.01.2020
Timing
01.01.2020 - 30.04.2020
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Kiinteistö- ja rakennusala
Campus
Myllypurontie 1
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Rakennusarkkitehtuurin tutkinto-ohjelma
Teachers
- Jarkko Könönen
- Kaisa Hyyti
Teacher in charge
Jarkko Könönen
Groups
-
TXR16S1Rakennusarkkitehtuurin tutkinto-ohjelma
Objective
On completion of the course, the student will be familiar with the planning of a demanding detached house, as well as the special features of the project. The student will be familiar with demanding detached house site management and site supervision.
The student will able to work on a demanding detached house site in planning or supervision tasks as an assistant of the building site supervisor.
The student will be familiar with the structure of the cost accounting and calculation for a demanding detached house. The student will be familiar with the legislation and regulations governing the project.
The student will be able to construct a professional presentation based on an exercise work.
Content
Demanding detached house project management and related documents.
Demanding detached house site management and its practices.
Demanding detached house cost accounting.
Demanding detached house legislation and regulations.
Demanding detached house and energy efficiency.
Occupational safety on a demanding detached house site.
Materials
Will be given with first lectures.
Teaching methods
Coursework
Guided assignments
Exam
Exam schedules
Will be given with first lectures.
Completion alternatives
No.
Student workload
Obtaining a mark of the course requires 80% participation in classroom instruction and guidance, etc.
Student´s workload is 27 h / ects, which includes contact teaching and independent work of the student.
Studies and the working load of the rehearsals are sized as per the all-time studies.
Obtaining a mark of the course requires that all course assignments are done satisfactorily.
If the course has a preliminary exam, it must be passed before student will start the course.
Further information
Construction design, advanced studies 1 and 2 courses should be passed before the course will start.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
The student is familiar with the course subjects on a satisfactory level.
The student has often been absent from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and rehearsals has been unsatisfactory.
The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and the student has problems to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is weak and the student has many gaps in his/her knowledge.
The student does not work independently and needs a lot of further guidance from the teacher. The student has not given a enough attention to the subject, and he/she does not have a clear overall understanding of the subject.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
The student is familiar with the course subjects on a good level.
The student has taken part in all teaching sessions and rehearsals and the activity on the course has been good.
The studies have proceeded consistently. The student is able to understand the basic topics of the course and is able to apply the theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning of the rehearsal tasks is valid and the student understands the causes and effects of one's choices in the tasks.
The student works independently but there is still some need for further guidance from the teacher. The student has given enough attention for the subject and has an overall understanding of the subject.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student masters the course subjects excellently.
The student has achieved the course objectives fully. The student has taken actively and constructively part in the teaching and the project.
The student masters the topics of the course and its prerequisites, and is able to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is professional and the student can validate the causes and effects of his/her choices.
The student works independently and takes initiative. The student masters the overall subject in both theory and practice.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
The student is familiar with the course subjects on a satisfactory level.
The student has often been absent from the teaching sessions. Activity during the teaching sessions and rehearsals has been unsatisfactory.
The capacity to formulate relevant problems associated with the work is limited and the student has problems to apply theoretical studies to practical work. The reasoning in the rehearsal tasks is weak and the student has many gaps in his/her knowledge.
The student does not work independently and needs a lot of further guidance from the teacher. The student has not given a enough attention to the subject, and he/she does not have a clear overall understanding of the subject.
Assessment methods and criteria
Continuous assessment
Learning assignment
Course activity
Exam
Qualifications
Course: Construction design, advanced studies 2, must be completed
Further information
The course is primarily meant for students of construction architecture, but is also suitable for construction engineering students.
Participation in class lessons and returning the assignments on schedule are part of the grounds of the evaluation.