Opinto-opas

Objective

Students are able to explain the structure and function of the lower limb joint. They identify and name the muscles, major nerves and blood vessels of the lower limb. They can explain the lower limb muscle function in joint movement. They use professional terminology.

Swedish 3 cr
Students achieve the oral and written proficiency in the second national language required by working life and the legislation of the University of Applied Sciences (352/2003, 8§). Students are able to communicate in work environment in Swedish both in Finland and in the Nordic countries. In these communication situations, students take into account the cultural and linguistic aspects. The student’s oral and written communication skills are at least in line with the European framework level B1. Students are able to acquire professional information from various sources and communicate information in writing and orally. During the studies, students develop a positive and realistic understanding of language and communication skills and the ability and motivation to improve these skills.

Content

Anatomy 2 cr:
Lower limb joints
Lower limb muscles
Nerves and blood vessels of the lower limb
Professional terminology

Swedish 3 cr:
Oral and written exercises related to the following topics that are relevant to each field of study are:
- self-assessment of language and communication skills and development of learning strategies
- education and career
- organizations, work environments, procedures, processes and instruments
- professional literature, accumulation and activation of professional terminology
- key interaction situations: individual and group communication

Further detailed content described in the implementation plan of the course.

Location and time

Ruotsi: kampuksella, lähiopetus, aikataulu lukujärjestyksessä

Materials

Ruotsi: opettajan oma, saatavilla ennen kurssin alkua pdf-muodossa

Teaching methods

Ruotsi: vuorovaikutteiset harjoitukset, parityöskentelyä, ryhmätyöskentelyä,

Exam schedules

Ruotsi: viimeisillä tunneilla suullinen tehtävä ja kirjallinen tentti, kaksi uusintaa mahdolllista

Student workload

Ruotsi:läsnäolo lähiopetuksessa 80%, itsenäistä opiskelua, kirjoitustehtävät tuntien ulkopuolella

Further information

Ruotsi: jos mahdollista lähiopetus kampuksella, läsnäolo lähiopetuksessa 80%, itsenäistä opiskelua, kirjoitustehtävät tuntien ulkopuolella

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Management of the foreign terminology is at least 50 % of what is demanded.
Students use foreign professional concepts systematically.
Students identify anatomical structures and repeat their meaning

Swedish Language:
The student can communicate in their most typical general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write simple texts with a reasonable amount of consistency. There may be errors, but the message comes across nevertheless. The student takes part in simple interaction, but often needs help from other speakers. The student is comfortable with everyday vocabulary and the vocabulary of their own field, but inaccuracies and the influence of other languages may make it difficult to get the message across. The student uses the commonest basic structures in a one-sided way and sometimes incorrectly. The student can pronounce understandably but not like a native, and the slowness makes it difficult to assess how well the message may get across.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Management of the foreign terminology is at least 70 % of what is demanded.
Students use foreign professional concepts expertly.
Students identify and describe anatomical structures and discover connections between structure and function.

Swedish Language:
The student can communicate reasonably well in their daily general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student is able to write a text with coherent content, getting the message across, and is proactive in interaction in common situations in the field. The student is reasonably fluent in basic vocabulary of their field and general language. Word choices may sometimes be inaccurate and the sentence structures imperfect, but these do not interfere with the communication. The student pronounces understandably, and pauses in the flow of speech do not prevent the message from getting across.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Management of the foreign terminology is at least 90 % of what is demanded.
Students use foreign professional concepts for example when answering essay questions.
Students identify anatomical structures and explain their function by analysing connections between structure and function.

Swedish Language:
The student can communicate in versatile and demanding general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write clear and detailed text in a way that is suitable and accurate for the situation. The student takes an active part in interaction in a way that is appropriate in professional situations. The student speaks fluently and effortlessly and takes into account the other speakers. The student uses general vocabulary and the vocabulary in their own field in a versatile way, making very few grammatical errors. The student pronounces clearly and the speech sounds natural.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Management of the foreign terminology is at least 50 % of what is demanded.
Students use foreign professional concepts systematically.
Students identify anatomical structures and repeat their meaning

Swedish Language:
The student can communicate in their most typical general and field-specific professional situations in working life. The student can write simple texts with a reasonable amount of consistency. There may be errors, but the message comes across nevertheless. The student takes part in simple interaction, but often needs help from other speakers. The student is comfortable with everyday vocabulary and the vocabulary of their own field, but inaccuracies and the influence of other languages may make it difficult to get the message across. The student uses the commonest basic structures in a one-sided way and sometimes incorrectly. The student can pronounce understandably but not like a native, and the slowness makes it difficult to assess how well the message may get across.

Assessment methods and criteria

Ruotsi: jatkuva arviointi, suullinen esitelmä, kirjallinen lopputentti, ruotsin arviointi asteikolla 0-5

Qualifications

Human anatomy 1-2
Professional communication and IT skills

Acquisition of professional language and communication skills in other native language (Swedish) requires European framework level B1.1.