Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Toimintaterapian syventävät opinnot 1 (5 cr)

Code: SX00CI29-3017

General information


Enrollment

30.11.2020 - 13.12.2020

Timing

08.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Virtual portion

2 op

Mode of delivery

60 % Contact teaching, 40 % Distance learning

Unit

Hyvinvointi

Campus

Myllypurontie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

0 - 70

Degree programmes

  • Toimintaterapian tutkinto-ohjelma

Teachers

  • Jasu Forss
  • Anne Talvenheimo-Pesu
  • Jari Pihlava
  • Kaija Kekäläinen

Teacher in charge

Jasu Forss

Objective

Students recognize key areas of occupational therapy in terms of their own professional development and the field’s future. They choose advanced studies in occupational therapy accordingly and add to their own competence and perspective on occupational therapy. Students are able to share what they have learnt about occupational therapy with others and influence others through rational and reasoned argumentation. They build new knowledge based on the competence that they have acquired. Students internalize the significance of continuous improvement as part of professional growth.

Content

In-depth study of the chosen area of occupational therapy. Sharing one’s own competence.

Teaching methods

Tämä opintojakso toteutetaan kansainvälisessä yhteistyössä siten, että 3op rakentuu yhteistyössä Belgian ja Itävallan toimintaterapiaopiskeljoiden kanssa. Yhteinen työskentelykieli on englanti, opintojaksolla selvitään yhdessä vaikka englannin kielen taito olisi vasta kehittymässä. Toinen 2op rakentuu omana oppimistehtävänä erillisten ohjeiden mukaan .

3op kansainvälinen osuus rakentuu 8.2.21 - 19.2.21 välillä etäyhteyksiä hyödyntäen. Ajanjaksolle tulee läsnäoloa vaativia etäkohtaamisia 11.-12.2. ja 15.-17.2. Tarkempi aikataulu päivien sisällöstä tammikuussa.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to:
- apply professional knowledge in the field appropriately
- use concepts and information in his field - argue a course of action on the basis of research information
and findings
- find information and argue the use of his sources
- work in various duties depending on the assignment
- define the principles of and requirements for his actions
- show that he has achieved the targets for core competence
- find out the safety instructions concerning a word assignments and to act accordingly
- act according to the relevant professional ethical principles
- plan and guide the operation of multidisciplinary groups
- communicate about professional issues

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to:
- use concepts and knowledge in his field fluently and comprehensively
- assess and use information sources and research information with a critical eye
- apply research information to professional assignments
- operate in a range of work situations, also in international contexts
- act in a client- and customer-oriented way and as an entrepreneur
- act responsibly in work duties, taking safety issues into consideration
- evaluate actions from the viewpoint of professional ethics
- represent his professional field in multidisciplinary and international groups and projects

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to:
- display a good understanding of professional information
- use theoretical and professional concepts and knowledge like an expert and combine them into larger
entities
- create and communicate new information
- develop innovative and alternative solutions to professional assignments and problems
- apply professional expertise in new situations
- take responsibility for a professional process in its entirety
- develop the community's safety and responsibility
- apply professional ethics in various situations
- manage the professional development of individuals/groups
- act purposefully and to develop himself and working life

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Fail 0
- The student does not know or appreciate knowledge in the field sufficiently
- The student cannot use concepts in the field properly
- The student's professional level is insufficient to be an expert
- The student is not acting in accordance with his training and guidance
- The student is careless about professional safety or ethical principles
- The student is not motivated by or participating in group or development work

Qualifications

Clinical placement 2 and 3.