Opinto-opas

Objective

Students recognize key areas of occupational therapy in terms of their own professional development and the field’s future. They choose advanced studies in occupational therapy accordingly and add to their own competence and perspective on occupational therapy. Students are able to share what they have learnt about occupational therapy with others and influence others through rational and reasoned argumentation. They build new knowledge based on the competence that they have acquired. Students internalize the significance of continuous improvement as part of professional growth.

Content

In-depth study of the chosen area of occupational therapy. Sharing one’s own competence.

Location and time

Info 14.5. at 9-11
Independent part of the studies - plan with Riitta Keponen
Independent studies during June-July 2017
Presentation and discussion week 33

Materials

Litterature at Moodle

Teaching methods

1) Preliminary assignment about clinical reasoning - working in pairs, interview your pair and write conclusions (written assignment)
2) Preparation of a presentation on chosen occupational therapy area/topic (working in pairs / group of three) produce also a literature reference list.
3) Presentation of topic, attendance and discussion.
4) Personal plan for professional development (written assignment).

Employer connections

It depends about individual study plan.

Exam schedules

Preliminary assingment - conclusions (written assignment) 19.5.
Personal plan for professional development must be forwarded into oma by 31.7.2019.
Professional topic presentation and litterature week 33

Completion alternatives

Esitykseen voi oman osuuden äänittää käyttäen esim. Sceen cast o matic applikaatiota.

Further information

14.5. klo 9-11 info.
Ennakkotehtävä palautus 19.5. mennessä.
Ohjauskerta 20.5. tai 25.5. syventymisaiheen suunnitelman hyväksyttäminen.
31.7.2019 on oman uran kehittymissuunnitelma tehtävän ehdoton palautuspäivä.
Alustukset pidetään viikolla 33, johon mennessä esitys ja siihen liittyvä kirjallisuuslista lähdemateriaalista palautetaan omaan.
-
Opintojakso tarkoitettu vain toimintaterapian opiskelijoille.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to:
- apply professional knowledge in the field appropriately
- use concepts and information in his field - argue a course of action on the basis of research information
and findings
- find information and argue the use of his sources
- work in various duties depending on the assignment
- define the principles of and requirements for his actions
- show that he has achieved the targets for core competence
- find out the safety instructions concerning a word assignments and to act accordingly
- act according to the relevant professional ethical principles
- plan and guide the operation of multidisciplinary groups
- communicate about professional issues

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to:
- use concepts and knowledge in his field fluently and comprehensively
- assess and use information sources and research information with a critical eye
- apply research information to professional assignments
- operate in a range of work situations, also in international contexts
- act in a client- and customer-oriented way and as an entrepreneur
- act responsibly in work duties, taking safety issues into consideration
- evaluate actions from the viewpoint of professional ethics
- represent his professional field in multidisciplinary and international groups and projects

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to:
- display a good understanding of professional information
- use theoretical and professional concepts and knowledge like an expert and combine them into larger
entities
- create and communicate new information
- develop innovative and alternative solutions to professional assignments and problems
- apply professional expertise in new situations
- take responsibility for a professional process in its entirety
- develop the community's safety and responsibility
- apply professional ethics in various situations
- manage the professional development of individuals/groups
- act purposefully and to develop himself and working life

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Fail 0
- The student does not know or appreciate knowledge in the field sufficiently
- The student cannot use concepts in the field properly
- The student's professional level is insufficient to be an expert
- The student is not acting in accordance with his training and guidance
- The student is careless about professional safety or ethical principles
- The student is not motivated by or participating in group or development work

Assessment methods and criteria

Preliminary assignment = Accept/failed
Group discussions, materials on professional topic = 0-5
Personal plan for professional development =Accepted/failed, possibility to raise numerical judgement.

Qualifications

Clinical placement 2 and 3.