Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Tutkimuksellisen kehittämistyön arviointi ja julkistaminen (15 cr)

Code: S000CY28-3004

General information


Enrollment

03.05.2021 - 16.05.2021

Timing

01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

Number of ECTS credits allocated

15 op

RDI portion

15 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Hyvinvointi

Campus

Myllypurontie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Degree programmes

  • Vanhustyön tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)

Teachers

  • Eveliina Holmgren
  • Kaija Matinheikki
  • Minna Kalajoki
  • Marianne Roivas
  • Tuula Mikkola

Teacher in charge

Tuula Mikkola

Groups

  • S1620S6
    Vanhustyön tutkinto-ohjelma ylempi

Objective

Students are able to:
- assess the research-oriented development project as a process and the individual, collective and societal benefits of the change brought about by the process
- report their work in accordance with good R&D reporting practices
- communicate work related aspects and work results in a way that benefits the world of work; the practises in service for old people and their own professional field in national and international contexts.

Content

Assessing individual, collective and societal benefits of the change brought about by development activities
Communication concerning the research-oriented development project both in speaking and in writing
A maturity test, which may take the form of a press release, an internal corporate bulletin, an essay or an article

Materials

n.d

Teaching methods

Seminar
Small group tutorial
Individual Tutorials
Process writing

Employer connections

n.d

Exam schedules

n.d

International connections

n.d

Completion alternatives

n.d

Student workload

15 ects (15*27h=405h student work)

Content scheduling

All together: 30.8.2021 12.45 -16.00
Small group tutorial:
- 31.8.2021 klo 8.45-16.00
- 25.10.2021 8.45 -16.00
Thesis Seminar:
- 17-18.11.2021 8.45-16.00
Maturity test: 19.11.2021: 8.45-12.00

Further information

n.d

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Evaluation, look at the attachment file of curriculum.
The areas of assessment are:
- The significance of the work to the working life partner, professional field, and/or to the development of the area
- Utilising of information sources and methodological skills
- Results and conclusions
- Mastering the research and development process
- Shared expertise and collaboration
- Ethic in reseach and developing work
- Communication skills, language, presentation and form of the thesis

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Evaluation, look at the attachment file of curriculum.
The areas of assessment are:
- The significance of the work to the working life partner, professional field, and/or to the development of the area
- Utilising of information sources and methodological skills
- Results and conclusions
- Mastering the research and development process
- Shared expertise and collaboration
- Ethic in reseach and developing work
- Communication skills, language, presentation and form of the thesis

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Evaluation, look at the attachment file of curriculum.
The areas of assessment are:
- The significance of the work to the working life partner, professional field, and/or to the development of the area
- Utilising of information sources and methodological skills
- Results and conclusions
- Mastering the research and development process
- Shared expertise and collaboration
- Ethic in reseach and developing work
- Communication skills, language, presentation and form of the thesis

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Evaluation, look at the attachment file of curriculum.
The areas of assessment are:
- The significance of the work to the working life partner, professional field, and/or to the development of the area
- Utilising of information sources and methodological skills
- Results and conclusions
- Mastering the research and development process
- Shared expertise and collaboration
- Ethic in reseach and developing work
- Communication skills, language, presentation and form of the thesis

Assessment methods and criteria

Attendance
Peer critique

Qualifications

.