Opinto-opas

Objective

The student understands the nature of managerial work in a constantly changing operating environment and is familiar with the principles of complexity thinking. The student is familiar with the historical background and different theories of systems thinking and is able to utilize systems intelligence in improving his/her performance and developing the work community.
The student is able to apply change management tools and theories and to expedite change in his/her own work community.
The student is familiar with the dynamics of change management and is able to implement successful change projects based on them.

Content

• Complexity thinking in managerial work and in a VUCA environment
• Systems thinking, theories and tools
• Systems intelligence as a managerial and organizational competence
• Transformation processes and the ability to implement profound change
• Constantly changing organizations and adaptability as a competitive factor
• Change dynamics as part of staff and change management

Location and time

The course will be organized online .

Materials

Navigating Through Changing Times : Knowledge Work in Complex Environments, Edited by Anne Eskola, Routledge 2017 (e-book)
Being Better Better. Livin with System intelligence
Hämäläinen, Jones, Saarinen http://systemsintelligence.aalto.fi/being_better_better/
Johtaja muutoksen ytimessä. Käsikirja uudistumismatkalle
Hille Korhonen, Tytti Bergman AlmaTalent 2019

Additional books and articles will be informed later.

Teaching methods

The course consists of lectures, group discussions, case exercises and independent study.
The course will be completed with learning assignments.

Exam schedules

No exam.

Completion alternatives

No alternative assignment.

Content scheduling

The learning outcomes, course contents, assignments and assessment criteria of the course are discussed during the first contact session.
More information about the literature later.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good overall performance: can apply and articulate concepts and information well both verbally and in writing, certain areas of individual or team output require further attention; shows appropriate level of interest and motivation in individual and team activities. Good presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent performance in all elements of the course: shows interest and motivation in individual and team activities and assignments, fully applies and clearly articulates concepts and information both verbally and in writing. The student is able to support his/her argument with references to the recommended reading and lecture content. Excellent presentation delivery and analysis.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Sufficient performance: has completed basic requirements to pass the course and has made an attempt to apply and articulate concepts and information both verbally and in writing but has not made enough effort overall. The student has demonstrated little effort, interest and motivation for individual or team activities / assignments and the output is rather weak.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is assessed on a scale of 1-5.

Qualifications

Completed Higher Education Degree