Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Toimintaterapian syventävät opinnot 1 (5 cr)

Code: SX00CI29-3014

General information


Enrollment

02.12.2019 - 15.12.2019

Timing

01.01.2020 - 24.05.2020

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Hyvinvointi

Campus

Myllypurontie 1

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Degree programmes

  • Toimintaterapian tutkinto-ohjelma

Teachers

  • Anne Talvenheimo-Pesu
  • Jari Pihlava
  • Ulla Vehkaperä

Teacher in charge

Anne Talvenheimo-Pesu

Groups

  • SXI17S1
    Toimintaterapian tutkinto-ohjelma

Objective

Students recognize key areas of occupational therapy in terms of their own professional development and the field’s future. They choose advanced studies in occupational therapy accordingly and add to their own competence and perspective on occupational therapy. Students are able to share what they have learnt about occupational therapy with others and influence others through rational and reasoned argumentation. They build new knowledge based on the competence that they have acquired. Students internalize the significance of continuous improvement as part of professional growth.

Content

In-depth study of the chosen area of occupational therapy. Sharing one’s own competence.

Location and time

Pair study plan with the teacher.
Individual study time during January-May 4 ECTS
Lectures (FAB)
Seminars (FAB)
Implementation is partly in Moodle.

Materials

Litterature at Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, seminars and pair and individual work and written essay.

Employer connections

It depends on the study plan.

Exam schedules

-

International connections

Together with students from Austria and Belgium, in english.

Completion alternatives

-

Student workload

-

Content scheduling

-

Further information

-

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student is able to:
- apply professional knowledge in the field appropriately
- use concepts and information in his field - argue a course of action on the basis of research information
and findings
- find information and argue the use of his sources
- work in various duties depending on the assignment
- define the principles of and requirements for his actions
- show that he has achieved the targets for core competence
- find out the safety instructions concerning a word assignments and to act accordingly
- act according to the relevant professional ethical principles
- plan and guide the operation of multidisciplinary groups
- communicate about professional issues

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student is able to:
- use concepts and knowledge in his field fluently and comprehensively
- assess and use information sources and research information with a critical eye
- apply research information to professional assignments
- operate in a range of work situations, also in international contexts
- act in a client- and customer-oriented way and as an entrepreneur
- act responsibly in work duties, taking safety issues into consideration
- evaluate actions from the viewpoint of professional ethics
- represent his professional field in multidisciplinary and international groups and projects

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student is able to:
- display a good understanding of professional information
- use theoretical and professional concepts and knowledge like an expert and combine them into larger
entities
- create and communicate new information
- develop innovative and alternative solutions to professional assignments and problems
- apply professional expertise in new situations
- take responsibility for a professional process in its entirety
- develop the community's safety and responsibility
- apply professional ethics in various situations
- manage the professional development of individuals/groups
- act purposefully and to develop himself and working life

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Fail 0
- The student does not know or appreciate knowledge in the field sufficiently
- The student cannot use concepts in the field properly
- The student's professional level is insufficient to be an expert
- The student is not acting in accordance with his training and guidance
- The student is careless about professional safety or ethical principles
- The student is not motivated by or participating in group or development work

Assessment methods and criteria

Seminars 50%
Personal plan for professional development 50%

Qualifications

Clinical placement 2 and 3.