Opinto-opas

Objective

The student will be able to
- report the results of the work, to assess them and to bring forth proposals for improvement in an appropriate way both in writing and in speech as well as visually.

Content

Reporting Thesis project
Work shops: tutorance for reporting and writing an abstract in English language
Maturity test
Evaluating Thesis process
Publishing Thesis results in written, oral or visual format for expert audience.

Location and time

Weeks 13-15

Materials

Literature of research methods, research articles.

Teaching methods

Individual and group tutorials, workshops, seminars.

Employer connections

Co-operation with the project members.

Exam schedules

Maturity test 21.4.20

International connections

-

Student workload

5 cr = 135 hours

Maturity test 21.4.2020

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The project will be evaluated when its all parts are ready.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See a separate framework for evaluation. When evaluating the competences, the evaluation criteria for competent/intermediate level is used.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved - fail. See evaluation guide enclosed.

Assessment methods and criteria

Learning assignment, accepted thesis, accepted maturity test.
Presentation and attendance in the reporting seminars.

Further information

The areas and targets in the assessment of the Bachelor’s Thesis
Professional competence and development
• significance for the profession and the connection to professional practices
• utilization of professional knowledge
• development of professional competence
• applicability in professional life
The methods used and the results obtained
• reliablility and ethics
• validity and innovation
• the usefulness of results
• the management of the thesis process and the development work
Communication and presentation
• structure and form
• the use of standard and professional language
• the focus, clarity and consistency of the text and expressions
• critical, analytical and reflective nature of communication
• argumentation and use of reference sources