Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Yhteisöllisen palvelun suunnitteluprojekti (10 cr)

Code: KM00DB17-3003

General information


Enrollment

01.11.2019 - 06.01.2020

Timing

12.03.2020 - 13.05.2020

Number of ECTS credits allocated

10 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Media, muotoilu ja konservointi

Campus

Hämeentie 135

Teaching languages

  • Finnish
  • English

Seats

0 - 20

Degree programmes

  • Viestinnän tutkinto-ohjelma

Teachers

  • Markus Norrena
  • Jukka Yrjönen

Teacher in charge

Mika Rintala

Groups

  • IEXSC20SH2
    Exchange Students Culture and Creative Industries, Helsinki 2020 Spring
  • KXD19S1DV
    Digitaalinen viestintä, S19

Objective

Students are capable of designing and implementing a social network service. Students are able to work in a specialist capacity in a multidisciplinary work group.

Content

Students work in projects where they take on a professional role in which they do not have advanced experience. The role may be, for example, one of the following: chief technology officer, producer/leader, user interface and usability designer or chief content and concept officer.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Regular attendance in meetings. Good teamwork skills. Good project documentation. Ability to apply the learned knowledge independently. Self-initiated learning. Ability to make use of feedback. The end product is adequate.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Regular attendance in meetings. Inspiring team worker. Ability to apply the learned knowledge and reflect on it. Exemplary interaction with clients. Excellent project documentation. The end product exceeds the client’s expectations.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Low attendance in meetings. Teamwork skills need improvement. Inadequate project documentation. Low self-direction. Assignments need improvement. Weak response to feedback. The end product is deficient.